Should all Gitmo detainees be immediately executed? - gary berntsen
Gary Berntsen was interviewed on Fox News, says that it is necessary to provide legal and implementation of all prisoners in Guantanamo.
After all China kill thousands each year and not even worth a yawn.
Tuesday, January 5, 2010
Gary Berntsen Should All Gitmo Detainees Be Immediately Executed?
11 comments:
WWJD?
While many states in the United States is still the death penalty, including Texas and Virginia do not have many states. The application of the death penalty puts us in company with North Korea, China, Iran, Pakistan and Iraq.
It would perform the legal, ethical or moral prisoners. The Supreme Court has already refused to consider the policy of the Bush administration to deal with the prisoners.
How many prisoners do not have a shred of evidence that it is the fault? More than just a few.
Considering the source (Fox News) This comment did not surprise me.
Maybe if we run all observers of Fox News, and all of Fox News?
It's an idea!
The lawyers can argue about what "legally know" until you know where they hang. It may even be on what that means, "as it has several ex-presidents, who will remain anonymous, they argue. However, we should kill the pigs have been a long time before they captured. Winston Churchill preferred 'execution on the field, "a long military tradition, at the top Nazis after the war." Roosevelt insisted, must comply with these bastards completely avoided the rights and culture that has lasted over 10,000 years, say for the benefit of a trial. Needless to say, he got his way, and is the main reason why we cut in the canteen, where we are today. When it dead on the floor, nobody does now. But I had to as a "human" life and then all of our heads, If you have a chance. Yes, I would like to see them all dead. It would save lives in the long term. But unfortunately the public never, and the new governmentnever go for it if it is likely in the end she let them all out. When this happens, stay away from tall buildings!
The lawyers can argue about what "legally know" until you know where they hang. It may even be on what that means, "as it has several ex-presidents, who will remain anonymous, they argue. However, we should kill the pigs have been a long time before they captured. Winston Churchill preferred 'execution on the field, "a long military tradition, at the top Nazis after the war." Roosevelt insisted, must comply with these bastards completely avoided the rights and culture that has lasted over 10,000 years, say for the benefit of a trial. Needless to say, he got his way, and is the main reason why we cut in the canteen, where we are today. When it dead on the floor, nobody does now. But I had to as a "human" life and then all of our heads, If you have a chance. Yes, I would like to see them all dead. It would save lives in the long term. But unfortunately the public never, and the new governmentnever go for it if it is likely in the end she let them all out. When this happens, stay away from tall buildings!
No. Many of them have no evidence against them, some are completely innocent.
Gary Bernsten not decide what is legal and what is not. Neither George Bush, the "decisive, but he feels himself above the law.
* A leading legal under international law to prisoners, or tortured. On what planet do you live?
I do not think you need to do.
should not be allowed to return to combat.
Solution is very cruel to close Guantanamo and send them home. at home, will be executed immediately.
safer than any other in Guantánamo, where, except Iran, North Korea and possibly in Somalia.
Yes and No, let me explain, for not only their own country
(it's like to be) a red flag that there is sufficient evidence to prove the facts which are problematic. I said, why the f ** k is to bring us here and give them something, no matter that some people there that we give them citizenship, that's ridiculous. Expedition people on a desert island, a place where it hurt anyone but himself.
Of course not!
Guilty something. Try some kind of a soldier? Support an idea nonamerican. Some of them are propably just look strange or suspicious. Do not fight against the United States.
If he has done to prisoners of war and must be treated as
Prisoners of war. America is proud of its democracy itself will
to export if others want it or not.
U.S. forces have killed more innocent people. Guantanamo
is an illegal concentration camp ignores any kind of law and
Human rights. Why not kill the people who started the war
Iraq based on lies like "they have weapons of mass destruction Destuction?
No, that would be against human rights. Because you do not want to support the country, all U.S. citizenship and repairs and is lost in the streets of America. Makes as much sense as giving civil liberties. It is the liberal.
They should be tried by a military tribunal as enemy combatants, at least. The implementation should be used only for the worst offenders (after killing x amount of soldiers to an enemy commander, etc..)
They should be tried by a military tribunal as enemy combatants, at least. The implementation should be used only for the worst offenders (after killing x amount of soldiers to an enemy commander, etc..)
Post a Comment